The revealed outcomes of sailors’ aggressive examinations for promotion throughout the naval service mirror a end result of devoted preparation, rigorous analysis, and profession milestones. These outcomes decide who advances to the following paygrade and assumes higher tasks inside their respective rankings. A hypothetical instance could be a Sailor attaining a excessive rating, leading to promotion to Petty Officer First Class.
Periodic evaluations are important for sustaining a extremely expert and motivated naval pressure. The outcomes of those evaluations not solely form particular person careers but additionally influence fleet readiness and operational effectiveness. Traditionally, the Navy has employed varied strategies for assessing and selling its personnel, frequently evolving to mirror the altering wants of a contemporary maritime pressure. This merit-based system fosters a aggressive setting that encourages skilled growth and acknowledges distinctive efficiency, finally contributing to a stronger, extra succesful Navy.
This text will additional discover varied facets of the promotion system, together with eligibility necessities, the examination course of, and the influence of those outcomes on profession development. Extra subjects will embrace sources accessible to assist sailors in search of development, and an summary of latest adjustments or updates to the system.
1. Eligibility Necessities
Eligibility necessities kind the muse upon which development throughout the U.S. Navy is constructed. These stipulations decide which sailors can compete for development to the following paygrade. Assembly these standards doesn’t assure promotion, however failing to fulfill them precludes a sailor from consideration. This cause-and-effect relationship immediately hyperlinks eligibility to development outcomes. For instance, a sailor should meet minimal time-in-rate necessities earlier than taking the development examination. With out the required time served, even an ideal rating on the examination is not going to lead to development. Different eligibility components embrace completion of required coaching, efficiency marks, and disciplinary file.
Particular eligibility necessities range by ranking and paygrade. Some rankings might require specialised coaching or {qualifications} previous to development. Understanding these particular necessities is crucial for sailors planning their profession development. Assets such because the Navy Development Guide and command profession counselors present detailed data concerning eligibility for every ranking. Sensible utility of this understanding permits sailors to focus their efforts on assembly the required stipulations, maximizing their probabilities of development when eligible. As an example, a sailor conscious of upcoming time-in-rate necessities can plan their profession timeline accordingly, avoiding potential delays in development alternative.
In abstract, eligibility necessities function a gatekeeper for development. Cautious consideration to those necessities is essential for any sailor in search of profession development throughout the Navy. Understanding and fulfilling these stipulations is step one in the direction of a profitable naval profession. Failure to fulfill even one requirement can considerably influence development outcomes, highlighting the significance of proactive profession planning and adherence to established tips. This understanding empowers sailors to navigate the complexities of the development system successfully.
2. Examination Scores
Examination scores play a pivotal function in figuring out development outcomes throughout the U.S. Navy. These scores, derived from standardized checks particular to every ranking and paygrade, assess a sailor’s information of their skilled duties, navy necessities, and management ideas. A powerful correlation exists between excessive examination scores and favorable development outcomes. The next rating signifies higher material experience, enhancing a sailor’s competitiveness throughout the development cycle. For instance, two sailors with equivalent efficiency evaluations however totally different examination scores will doubtless expertise totally different development outcomes; the sailor with the upper rating has a higher probability of promotion.
The significance of examination scores stems from their important weighting throughout the closing a number of rating (FMS). The FMS is a composite rating used to rank eligible sailors competing for development. Examination scores typically comprise a considerable portion of the FMS, immediately influencing a sailor’s rating and due to this fact their probability of promotion. This direct influence underscores the sensible significance of devoted examination preparation. Take into account a situation the place a number of sailors possess related efficiency evaluations and time in fee. In such instances, the examination rating can change into the deciding consider figuring out who advances. Investing effort and time in finding out related supplies and practising test-taking methods can yield substantial returns within the type of improved examination scores, and consequently, enhanced development prospects.
In abstract, examination scores are a crucial determinant of development throughout the Navy. Their weighted contribution to the FMS immediately influences a sailor’s competitiveness and likelihood of promotion. Recognizing this significant connection emphasizes the sensible worth of targeted examine and diligent preparation for development examinations. This understanding permits sailors to strategy examinations strategically, maximizing their potential for achievement within the aggressive development setting.
3. Efficiency Evaluations
Efficiency evaluations represent a crucial element of Navy development outcomes. These evaluations present a formalized evaluation of a sailor’s skilled efficiency, navy bearing, and management potential. A direct causal relationship exists between analysis outcomes and development alternative. Sturdy efficiency evaluations contribute considerably to a sailor’s competitiveness throughout the development system. For instance, a sailor constantly receiving prime marks in areas like job proficiency, management, and initiative demonstrates a excessive degree of efficiency, rising their probabilities of promotion. Conversely, constantly subpar evaluations can hinder development prospects, even when examination scores are excessive. This underscores the significance of sustained superior efficiency all through a sailor’s profession.
Evaluations contribute to development outcomes by means of their influence on the ultimate a number of rating (FMS). Much like examination scores, efficiency marks issue closely within the FMS calculation. Analysis outcomes translate into efficiency mark common (PMA) factors, which immediately affect a sailor’s rating amongst friends. The sensible significance of this weighting is evident: constant excessive efficiency, mirrored in robust evaluations, results in a better PMA and thus improves a sailor’s standing throughout the aggressive development course of. As an example, two sailors with equivalent examination scores however differing PMAs will doubtless see divergent development outcomes; the sailor with the upper PMA positive aspects a aggressive edge. This illustrates the sensible worth of constantly striving for excellence in all facets of naval service.
In abstract, efficiency evaluations signify a cornerstone of the Navy development system. Their substantial contribution to the FMS calculation immediately influences a sailor’s competitiveness and prospects for promotion. Sustained superior efficiency, documented by means of constantly robust evaluations, proves important for profession development. Understanding this connection permits sailors to prioritize constant efficiency excellence as a key technique for attaining their development targets. This consciousness empowers sailors to strategy their duties with the understanding that day by day actions immediately affect future profession alternatives throughout the Navy.
4. Time in Charge (TIR)
Time in Charge (TIR) stands as a basic issue influencing development throughout the U.S. Navy. It represents the period a sailor has served at their present paygrade. TIR necessities function a baseline qualification for development, making certain sailors possess satisfactory expertise earlier than assuming elevated tasks. Understanding the influence of TIR is essential for efficient profession planning and navigating the complexities of naval development.
-
Minimal TIR Necessities:
Every paygrade throughout the Navy carries a minimal TIR requirement that have to be met earlier than a sailor is eligible to compete for development. These necessities range relying on the precise ranking and paygrade. As an example, development to Petty Officer Second Class may require a minimal of 12 months TIR as a Petty Officer Third Class, whereas development to Petty Officer First Class might necessitate 36 months TIR as a Petty Officer Second Class. Failing to fulfill these minimal necessities disqualifies a sailor from development consideration, no matter efficiency or examination scores. This underscores the significance of monitoring TIR and making certain adequate time served at every paygrade.
-
TIR as a Aggressive Issue:
Past minimal eligibility, TIR can affect development competitiveness. Whereas not as closely weighted as efficiency evaluations or examination scores, TIR contributes to the ultimate a number of rating (FMS). In instances the place a number of sailors possess related efficiency metrics and examination scores, TIR can function a tie-breaker. A sailor with extra TIR may achieve a slight benefit, demonstrating an extended interval of sustained efficiency at their present degree. This nuance highlights the potential advantages of exceeding minimal TIR necessities.
-
TIR and Development Alternative:
TIR interacts with development alternative quotas. Restricted development quotas inside sure rankings can lead to extremely aggressive development cycles. In such eventualities, even assembly minimal TIR necessities doesn’t assure promotion. Sailors with longer TIR may need a aggressive edge, however finally, development hinges on the general FMS and the variety of accessible quotas. This interaction between TIR and quotas emphasizes the significance of constantly excessive efficiency and robust examination scores.
-
TIR and Profession Planning:
Understanding TIR necessities is essential for efficient profession planning. Sailors in search of to advance ought to rigorously observe their TIR and plan accordingly. This proactive strategy permits sailors to anticipate eligibility home windows and align their skilled growth efforts with development timelines. For instance, a sailor conscious of upcoming TIR necessities can prioritize finishing required coaching or specializing in enhancing efficiency in particular areas to maximise their competitiveness when eligible for development. This forward-thinking strategy optimizes possibilities for profession development.
In abstract, TIR is an integral element of the Navy development system. It features as each a baseline qualification and a contributing issue to general competitiveness. By understanding the nuances of TIR necessities and their influence on development outcomes, sailors can successfully plan their careers and maximize their potential for promotion throughout the naval service. This complete understanding empowers sailors to navigate the development system strategically, making certain they’re well-positioned for profession success.
5. Awards and Decorations
Awards and decorations throughout the U.S. Navy signify recognition for excellent efficiency, important achievements, and contributions to the naval service. Whereas not a main determinant of development, these accolades play a noteworthy function within the general analysis of a sailor’s profession development and contribute to their aggressive edge in development cycles. Understanding the connection between awards and decorations and development outcomes is crucial for profession planning and maximizing development potential.
-
Contribution to Ultimate A number of Rating (FMS):
Awards and decorations contribute factors towards a sailor’s FMS. Whereas the weighting of those factors is much less important than that of efficiency evaluations or examination scores, they’ll nonetheless present a useful benefit in aggressive development eventualities. Accumulating awards and decorations demonstrates a sustained sample of superior efficiency and dedication, enhancing a sailor’s general profile. As an example, two sailors with related efficiency marks and examination scores may be differentiated by their awards and decorations, with the extra adorned sailor probably receiving an edge within the FMS calculation. This underscores the significance of striving for excellence that warrants recognition.
-
Reflection of Professionalism and Dedication:
Awards and decorations signify tangible proof of a sailor’s dedication, professionalism, and dedication to the Navy’s core values. Incomes such recognition signifies constant excessive efficiency, initiative, and management potential, qualities extremely valued throughout the development system. For instance, receiving a Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal for excellent efficiency in a selected obligation project indicators a sailor’s dedication to excellence, which may positively affect perceptions throughout development choice boards. This highlights the significance of constantly exceeding expectations in all assigned duties.
-
Impression on Choice Boards:
Whereas the FMS performs a key function in preliminary development rankings, choice boards typically think about the totality of a sailor’s file when making closing development selections. Awards and decorations present concrete examples of achievements and contributions, providing a richer context for evaluating a sailor’s general efficiency. A strong file of awards can reinforce robust efficiency evaluations and examination scores, strengthening a sailor’s candidacy for development. For instance, a sailor with a number of Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medals may be considered extra favorably by a variety board than a sailor with an equal FMS however fewer decorations, because the medals present tangible proof of sustained superior efficiency. This underscores the significance of in search of alternatives to excel and contribute to the mission.
-
Motivation and Morale:
Past their influence on development, awards and decorations function highly effective motivators for particular person sailors and contribute to general unit morale. Publicly recognizing achievement reinforces constructive behaviors and encourages continued excellence. This constructive reinforcement fosters a tradition of excessive efficiency, not directly contributing to improved development outcomes throughout the command. As an example, a sailor acknowledged with a Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal for superior efficiency may encourage their friends to attempt for related ranges of accomplishment, finally elevating the general efficiency requirements throughout the unit. This highlights the broader influence of awards and decorations on the naval neighborhood.
In abstract, whereas not a direct determinant in the identical method as examination scores and efficiency evaluations, awards and decorations kind a useful element of a sailor’s general development profile. They contribute to the FMS, mirror dedication and professionalism, affect choice boards, and contribute to a constructive command local weather. A complete understanding of their function permits sailors to understand their worth past particular person recognition and leverage them as a part of a broader technique for profession development throughout the U.S. Navy.
6. Development Quotas
Development quotas immediately affect Navy development outcomes, representing the finite variety of accessible development alternatives inside every ranking and paygrade. Quotas are decided by personnel necessities, budgetary constraints, and the general construction of the Navy. This creates a cause-and-effect relationship the place the variety of accessible quotas immediately limits the variety of sailors who can advance, no matter particular person efficiency. For instance, if 100 sailors are eligible for development to Petty Officer First Class inside a selected ranking, however the quota is simply 20, then solely 20 sailors will advance, even when greater than 20 meet the minimal eligibility necessities and carry out effectively on the examination. This underscores the aggressive nature of naval development.
Development quotas operate as a crucial management mechanism throughout the development system. They regulate the stream of personnel by means of the ranks, making certain applicable manning ranges at every paygrade. The quotas additionally inject a major aspect of competitors into the development course of. Even sailors who obtain excessive scores on examinations and obtain wonderful efficiency evaluations might not advance if the quota for his or her ranking and paygrade is especially restrictive. Understanding quota limitations supplies a practical context for deciphering development outcomes. As an example, a sailor who narrowly missed development in a extremely aggressive ranking with a small quota may discover this much less discouraging than a sailor who missed development in a ranking with a big quota. This sensible understanding emphasizes the significance of constantly striving for peak efficiency to maximise development potential.
In abstract, development quotas kind an integral element of Navy development outcomes. They set up the higher restrict of development alternatives, making a aggressive setting the place efficiency and eligibility are important however not all the time adequate for development. Recognizing the function and influence of quotas permits sailors to develop knowledgeable expectations and handle profession development strategically throughout the framework of Navy personnel necessities. This understanding reinforces the significance of constant excessive efficiency, diligent examination preparation, and proactive profession planning in navigating the complexities of the Navy development system.
7. Ultimate A number of Rating (FMS)
The Ultimate A number of Rating (FMS) features because the cornerstone of U.S. Navy development outcomes, immediately figuring out which sailors advance to the following paygrade. This rating represents a composite evaluation of a sailor’s {qualifications}, encompassing efficiency evaluations, examination scores, awards, time in fee, and different components. A direct, causal relationship exists between FMS and development outcomes. The next FMS will increase the probability of development, whereas a decrease FMS decreases it. The FMS rating of eligible candidates inside a selected ranking and paygrade determines who receives development alternatives inside quota limitations. For instance, if two sailors are competing for one development slot, the sailor with the upper FMS will obtain the promotion. This highlights the crucial significance of maximizing every element contributing to the FMS.
The sensible significance of understanding the FMS lies in its predictive energy. By understanding the weighted parts throughout the FMS calculation, sailors can focus their efforts on areas yielding the best return when it comes to rating enchancment. For instance, if examination scores carry a heavier weight than awards factors, a sailor may prioritize examine time over pursuing extra awards. This strategic strategy permits for optimized effort towards maximizing development potential. Moreover, consciousness of FMS calculations helps sailors perceive development outcomes inside their particular ranking and paygrade. A extremely aggressive ranking with restricted quotas may require a considerably greater FMS for development in comparison with a much less aggressive ranking. This comparative evaluation permits sensible expectations and knowledgeable profession planning.
In abstract, the FMS just isn’t merely a numerical worth however a pivotal determinant of profession development throughout the Navy. Its composite nature displays a holistic evaluation of a sailor’s {qualifications}. An intensive understanding of the FMS calculation and its parts empowers sailors to make knowledgeable selections concerning profession growth and development preparation. This understanding interprets to sensible utility by means of strategic prioritization of efforts, leading to maximized development potential throughout the aggressive panorama of naval service.
8. Promotion Suggestions
Promotion suggestions signify a crucial juncture throughout the U.S. Navy development system, immediately influencing profession trajectory and shaping general development outcomes. These suggestions, originating from commanding officers and different approved superiors, present a qualitative evaluation of a sailor’s readiness for elevated accountability and management. Serving as a vital element of the development course of, promotion suggestions supply useful perception right into a sailor’s potential and contribute considerably to the ultimate dedication of development outcomes.
-
Commanding Officer’s Enter:
The commanding officer’s promotion advice carries substantial weight. This evaluation displays the commanding officer’s direct remark of a sailor’s efficiency, management qualities, and general suitability for development. Suggestions vary from “Should Promote” (extremely really helpful) to “Promote” (really helpful) to “Progressing” (potential for future promotion) to “Not Really helpful” (not appropriate for development presently). A “Should Promote” advice signifies distinctive efficiency and potential, considerably strengthening a sailor’s development prospects. Conversely, a “Not Really helpful” designation can severely hinder development alternatives. This underscores the significance of constantly demonstrating robust efficiency and management potential to earn a positive advice.
-
Analysis Correlation:
Promotion suggestions ideally align with efficiency evaluations. Consistency between evaluations and proposals strengthens the general credibility of a sailor’s development profile. A sailor with constantly excessive efficiency marks coupled with a “Should Promote” advice presents a compelling case for development. Conversely, discrepancies between evaluations and proposals, resembling excessive efficiency marks coupled with a decrease promotion advice, can elevate questions and probably influence development outcomes. This highlights the significance of open communication with superiors and addressing any efficiency gaps to make sure alignment between evaluations and proposals.
-
Impression on Choice Boards:
Promotion suggestions present useful context for choice boards reviewing development candidates. Whereas the Ultimate A number of Rating (FMS) provides a quantitative evaluation, promotion suggestions supply qualitative insights right into a sailor’s potential, work ethic, and management capabilities. Choice boards rigorously think about these suggestions, particularly in instances the place candidates possess related FMS scores. A powerful advice can distinguish a sailor from friends and positively affect the board’s closing determination. This emphasizes the significance of cultivating robust skilled relationships with superiors and constantly demonstrating qualities valued by the Navy.
-
Profession Development Implications:
Promotion suggestions affect not solely quick development alternatives but additionally long-term profession development. Constant patterns of robust suggestions show sustained efficiency and management potential, making a constructive trajectory for future development and profession growth. Conversely, a sample of decrease suggestions can sign areas needing enchancment and may hinder future profession alternatives. This underscores the significance of viewing promotion suggestions not simply as remoted occasions however as integral parts of long-term profession administration. Sailors ought to actively search suggestions from superiors and work diligently to deal with any recognized weaknesses to enhance future suggestions and improve profession prospects.
In conclusion, promotion suggestions are integral to Navy development outcomes, offering important qualitative context that enhances quantitative efficiency information. Commanding officer enter, correlation with evaluations, influence on choice boards, and implications for profession development all spotlight the importance of those suggestions in shaping particular person development outcomes. Understanding this interaction empowers sailors to strategy profession growth strategically, specializing in constant excessive efficiency, cultivating robust management qualities, and fostering constructive skilled relationships to safe favorable suggestions and maximize their potential for development throughout the Navy.
9. Official Development Lists
Official Development Lists signify the end result of the U.S. Navy development course of, formally asserting the names of sailors chosen for promotion to the following paygrade. These lists immediately mirror the outcomes of development examinations, efficiency evaluations, awards, time in fee, and promotion suggestions, solidifying the outcomes of the aggressive cycle. The lists set up a direct, causal hyperlink between particular person efficiency and development alternative. A sailor’s look on the listing confirms their profitable competitors and marks a major milestone of their naval profession. Conversely, absence from the listing signifies that development has not been achieved within the present cycle. For instance, a sailor showing on the listing for development to Petty Officer First Class has demonstrably met the necessities and outperformed friends competing for restricted quotas. This achievement interprets to elevated accountability, greater pay, and profession development.
The significance of Official Development Lists extends past particular person recognition. These lists function official information, documenting profession development throughout the Navy. They supply a verifiable supply for figuring out a sailor’s development historical past and {qualifications}, impacting future assignments, coaching alternatives, and management roles. Moreover, the lists contribute to general pressure administration, informing manning ranges and personnel distribution throughout totally different rankings and paygrades. For instance, the variety of developments inside a selected ranking, mirrored within the official listing, can affect future recruitment and coaching quotas, making certain the Navy maintains the required personnel stability to fulfill operational necessities. This sensible utility highlights the broader significance of development lists throughout the general construction of the Navy.
In abstract, Official Development Lists are usually not merely bulletins however formal confirmations of accomplishment throughout the Navy development system. They signify the tangible consequence of a aggressive course of, immediately impacting particular person careers and influencing broader pressure administration selections. Understanding the importance of those liststheir connection to particular person efficiency, their function as official information, and their affect on pressure managementprovides useful context for navigating the complexities of naval development and appreciating its influence on each particular person sailors and the Navy as an entire.
Ceaselessly Requested Questions Relating to Development
This part addresses frequent inquiries concerning Navy development outcomes, offering readability and steerage for navigating the complexities of the promotion system.
Query 1: When are development outcomes sometimes launched?
Launch dates range relying on the precise development cycle. Data is usually disseminated by way of official Navy channels, together with Navy Personnel Command web sites and command bulletins.
Query 2: How are development quotas decided?
Quotas mirror personnel wants, budgetary constraints, and the general pressure construction of the Navy. These necessities fluctuate primarily based on operational calls for and strategic planning.
Query 3: What’s the function of the Ultimate A number of Rating (FMS)?
The FMS serves as the first rating mechanism for development candidates. It contains varied weighted components, together with efficiency evaluations, examination scores, awards, and time in fee.
Query 4: How can a sailor enhance their probabilities of development?
Constant superior efficiency, devoted examination preparation, and proactive profession planning are essential for maximizing development potential. Searching for mentorship and steerage from senior personnel additionally proves useful.
Query 5: What sources can be found to help sailors with the development course of?
Command profession counselors, academic providers officers, and the Navy Development Middle present useful sources, together with examine supplies, examination data, and personalised steerage.
Query 6: What occurs if a sailor just isn’t chosen for development?
Non-selection doesn’t preclude future development alternatives. Sailors ought to evaluate their efficiency, establish areas for enchancment, and proceed making ready for subsequent development cycles.
Understanding the dynamics of the development system, together with quotas, FMS calculations, and accessible sources, is essential for navigating the trail towards profession development throughout the Navy.
For additional data and particular steerage, seek the advice of official Navy sources and command profession counselors. They will present tailor-made assist and deal with particular person circumstances successfully.
Suggestions for Navigating Navy Development
Strategic planning and constant effort are essential for profitable navigation of the Navy’s aggressive development system. The next suggestions present sensible steerage for maximizing development potential.
Tip 1: Perceive Development Necessities: Completely evaluate the necessities for particular rankings and paygrades. Seek the advice of official sources just like the Navy Development Guide and command profession counselors for detailed data concerning eligibility standards, examination content material, and efficiency expectations. This foundational information permits efficient planning and preparation.
Tip 2: Prioritize Sustained Superior Efficiency: Constant excessive efficiency in day by day duties varieties the cornerstone of development success. Attempt for excellence in all assigned duties, demonstrating initiative, management potential, and dedication to the Navy’s core values. Documented superior efficiency immediately impacts evaluations and promotion suggestions.
Tip 3: Dedicate Time to Examination Preparation: Development examinations assess crucial information and abilities related to particular rankings. Devoted examine, using accessible sources such because the Navy Development Middle and command examine teams, considerably improves examination efficiency. Targeted preparation will increase the probability of attaining aggressive scores.
Tip 4: Search Mentorship and Steerage: Skilled mentors, together with senior enlisted personnel and command profession counselors, supply useful insights and steerage for navigating the complexities of the development system. Mentorship supplies personalised assist and facilitates knowledgeable decision-making.
Tip 5: Monitor Time in Charge (TIR): Preserve consciousness of TIR necessities for desired paygrades. Enough TIR is a prerequisite for development eligibility. Monitoring TIR permits proactive planning and ensures well timed success of this crucial requirement.
Tip 6: Perceive the Ultimate A number of Rating (FMS): Familiarize oneself with the FMS calculation, together with the weighting of particular person parts. This understanding permits strategic prioritization of efforts to maximise general rating and enhance competitiveness.
Tip 7: Attempt for Awards and Recognition: Whereas not the only real determinant, awards and decorations contribute to a sailor’s general profile and might improve development prospects. Search alternatives to excel and contribute to the mission, probably incomes recognition that displays dedication and professionalism.
By constantly making use of the following pointers, sailors considerably improve their prospects for development, contributing to each particular person profession development and the general power of the naval pressure. These sensible methods empower sailors to navigate the aggressive development panorama successfully and obtain their skilled targets throughout the Navy.
The next part concludes this overview of Navy development, summarizing key takeaways and providing closing suggestions for continued profession growth.
Conclusion
Naval development outcomes signify a end result of particular person effort, rigorous analysis, and the Navy’s personnel wants. This text explored the multifaceted nature of the development system, inspecting key parts resembling eligibility necessities, the function of examination scores and efficiency evaluations, the influence of time in fee and awards, the importance of quotas and the ultimate a number of rating, the load of promotion suggestions, and the conclusive nature of official development lists. Understanding these interconnected parts is essential for profitable navigation of the aggressive development panorama.
Development throughout the Navy signifies elevated accountability, skilled progress, and contribution to a crucial nationwide safety mission. Dedication to steady enchancment, proactive engagement with the development system, and a dedication to excellence stay important for attaining particular person profession aspirations and making certain a extremely expert and succesful naval pressure. Constant effort, knowledgeable decision-making, and a give attention to skilled growth pave the trail towards profitable development and contribute to the enduring power of the U.S. Navy.
